Employment Lawyer Discusses what Trump Offer to Federal Employees to Resign Would Do

MICHEL MARTIN, HOST: Federal staff members have up until February 6 to choose whether to voluntarily leave their jobs. The U.S. Office of Personnel Management, OPM, informed employees on Tuesday that if they hand in their resignation by next Thursday – that’s less than a week from now – most will be enabled to depart and be paid until the end of September. Michelle Bercovici is a work legal representative who represents federal workers as a big part of her practice, so I asked her for her analysis about what OPM’s postponed resignation program would really mean.MICHELLE BERCOVICI: I actually do not consider it a lot a deal. I believe it’s a demand employment to resign with a vague pledge that, possibly, you could be kept in administrative leave status for as much as 8 months – however no guarantees.MARTIN: Some individuals have actually been using the term buyout to describe what this is since there appears to be the offer of administrative leave for as much as 8 months if you take this deal. So is it a buyout?BERCOVICI: I would definitely not describe it as a buyout. I believe that’s a really misleading term to use in this circumstance. When you consider a buyout, there’s normally some sort of written agreement or a concrete offer to offer a benefit in for waiving certain rights. That is not the case here.MARTIN: If customers ask you for your advice, what are you informing them?BERCOVICI: First thing we tell them is workout severe care. There are no assurances included in this email. The only thing I can inform you for specific is that if you alter your mind, the firm’s most likely not going to let you withdraw that resignation, and you are basically quiting control over a lot.MARTIN: employment Exists some category of worker who you think this might benefit? Maybe they’re close to retirement. Is someone like that may this be an appealing offer?BERCOVICI: Folks near retirement require to be the most cautious because leaving earlier than meant can have serious effects, possibly, on their benefits.MARTIN: Let me just play a clip from the White House press secretary, Karoline Leavitt. She told reporters that this is a great deal for people who don’t want to go back to the office. Let me simply play it.(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)KAROLINE LEAVITT: This is a tip to federal workers that they have to return in – to work. And if they do not, then they have the choice to resign, and this administration is extremely generously offering to pay them for 8 months.MARTIN: You’re shaking your head no.BERCOVICI: It simply – in a manner, it breaks my heart that federal employees are being jerked around like this. It sends out a signal to me that this return-to-office order remains in bad faith, that it’s created to get folks who work actually hard to resign. I believe it’s attempting to pull the wool over a great deal of individuals’s eyes because there are no guarantees. And these are people who enjoy their task. They like the mission of the company. They work hard. And today, they’re facing really tough choices, especially if they’re remote. I mean, it’s extremely coercive.MARTIN: employment You state it’s coercive. Because?BERCOVICI: Essentially, if you’re someone who resides in Oregon and has been informed to report to D.C. otherwise we’re going to fire you, they might feel that they have no option than to take this option.MARTIN: Do you expect legal difficulties just to the deal itself? And if so, on what grounds?BERCOVICI: This deal, to be truthful, is so extraordinary that I believe a great deal of us are still trying to find out what to do with it. I’m uncertain if the deal itself may be challengeable. I think the larger question is the execution of these terms. I’m not knowledgeable about any authority that exists today for OPM to purchase firms to provide this variety of individuals administrative leave. So I believe it is extremely much possibly setting the stage for difficulties since I feel OPM has actually vastly exceeded their authority.MARTIN: That is Michelle Bercovici. She is an employment legal representative with the Alden Law Group here in Washington, D.C. Thank you so much for joining us.BERCOVICI: Thank you a lot for having me here.

Copyright © 2025 NPR. All rights scheduled. Visit our site terms of usage and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further info.

NPR records are created on a rush due date by an NPR contractor. This text might not remain in its last kind and might be upgraded or modified in the future. Accuracy and availability might vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.