How an AI-written Book Shows why the Tech ‘Horrifies’ Creatives

For Christmas I received an interesting gift from a pal – my extremely own “best-selling” book.

“Tech-Splaining for Dummies” (fantastic title) bears my name and my photo on its cover, and it has radiant evaluations.

Yet it was entirely composed by AI, with a few basic prompts about me provided by my pal Janet.

It’s an interesting read, and very amusing in parts. But it likewise meanders rather a lot, and is someplace between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It simulates my chatty design of writing, however it’s also a bit repetitive, and very verbose. It may have exceeded Janet’s triggers in looking at data about me.

Several sentences begin “as a leading technology reporter …” – cringe – which might have been scraped from an online bio.

There’s also a strange, repeated hallucination in the kind of my cat (I have no pets). And there’s a metaphor on nearly every page – some more random than others.

There are lots of business online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I contacted the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he told me he had sold around 150,000 customised books, mainly in the US, since pivoting from compiling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The company uses its own AI tools to produce them, based on an open source big language model.

I’m not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can’t – just Janet, who developed it, can order any more copies.

There is currently no barrier to anybody producing one in anyone’s name, consisting of celebs – although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around abusive material. Each book contains a printed disclaimer specifying that it is imaginary, produced by AI, and created “entirely to bring humour and pleasure”.

Legally, the copyright comes from the company, but Mr Mashiach stresses that the item is planned as a “personalised gag gift”, and the books do not get offered further.

He hopes to widen his variety, generating different categories such as sci-fi, and perhaps using an autobiography service. It’s created to be a light-hearted type of customer AI – offering AI-generated items to human customers.

It’s also a bit scary if, like me, you compose for a living. Not least since it most likely took less than a minute to create, and it does, definitely in some parts, sound similar to me.

Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have actually expressed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then churn out comparable content based upon it.

“We ought to be clear, when we are talking about data here, we actually mean human creators’ life works,” says Ed Newton Rex, founder of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI companies to regard developers’ rights.

“This is books, this is posts, this is pictures. It’s masterpieces. It’s records … The entire point of AI training is to learn how to do something and then do more like that.”

In 2023 a tune including AI-generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms because it was not their work and they had not granted it. It didn’t stop the track’s creator attempting to nominate it for a Grammy award. And despite the fact that the artists were phony, it was still hugely popular.

“I do not believe the usage of generative AI for creative purposes must be prohibited, however I do believe that generative AI for these purposes that is trained on individuals’s work without approval ought to be banned,” Mr Newton Rex adds. “AI can be extremely effective but let’s construct it morally and fairly.”

OpenAI states Chinese rivals utilizing its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: wiki.rrtn.org The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China’s DeepSeek AI shakes market and dents America’s swagger

In the UK some organisations – consisting of the BBC – have chosen to block AI designers from trawling their online material for training functions. Others have actually decided to work together – the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for example.

The UK federal government is considering an overhaul of the law that would permit AI developers to use creators’ material on the internet to help establish their models, unless the rights holders choose out.

Ed Newton Rex explains this as “madness”.

He mentions that AI can make advances in locations like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.

“All of these things work without going and changing copyright law and destroying the livelihoods of the nation’s creatives,” he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in the House of Lords, is also highly against removing copyright law for AI.

“Creative industries are wealth creators, 2.4 million jobs and a whole lot of joy,” states the Baroness, who is likewise an advisor to the for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

“The government is undermining one of its finest performing markets on the vague pledge of growth.”

A federal government representative stated: “No move will be made up until we are absolutely confident we have a practical plan that delivers each of our goals: increased control for right holders to assist them accredit their content, access to top quality product to train leading AI models in the UK, and more openness for ideal holders from AI designers.”

Under the UK federal government’s brand-new AI strategy, a nationwide data library including public data from a large range of sources will likewise be provided to AI researchers.

In the US the future of federal rules to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump’s go back to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to increase the security of AI with, among other things, companies in the sector required to share details of the workings of their systems with the US government before they are released.

But this has now been reversed by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do rather, but he is stated to want the AI sector to deal with less policy.

This comes as a variety of claims against AI companies, and especially versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have been secured by everybody from the New york city Times to authors, music labels, and even a comedian.

They claim that the AI firms broke the law when they took their material from the web without their authorization, and used it to train their systems.

The AI companies argue that their actions fall under “fair use” and are therefore exempt. There are a variety of factors which can make up reasonable usage – it’s not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector is under increasing examination over how it gathers training data and whether it must be paying for it.

If this wasn’t all adequate to contemplate, Chinese AI company DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the previous week. It ended up being one of the most downloaded totally free app on Apple’s US App Store.

DeepSeek claims that it established its technology for a fraction of the cost of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security concerns in the US, and threatens American’s present supremacy of the sector.

When it comes to me and a career as an author, I think that at the minute, if I truly want a “bestseller” I’ll still have to write it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the existing weak point in generative AI tools for larger projects. It has lots of errors and hallucinations, and it can be rather tough to check out in parts due to the fact that it’s so verbose.

But provided how rapidly the tech is progressing, I’m not exactly sure how long I can stay positive that my considerably slower human writing and modifying skills, are better.

Sign up for fraternityofshadows.com our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the most significant developments in global technology, with analysis from BBC reporters worldwide.

Outside the UK? Register here.